now we understand what information technology is changing in a more concrete way not only our way of life but to think. I often imagine what it would be useful in real life a command "undo" to solve minor problems, errors, and details that punctuate our days. The virtual environment, we experience every time the computer interface projects us in it, is so penetrated the way we do (and be) that even-for example-is lost during the years of writing experience schools, so accustomed to typing letters, not more paths and then to associate symbol to the button, missing the point, his physicality, to lose themselves completely in the world of ideas and information. The keyboard and mouse are peripheral, not a thing of the credit quality of the virtual environment, but our "comfort" of dialogue with the machine. Flat panel displays and light enters the world sank into our eyes, projecting a kind "other" for now-yet-experienced only through sight and hearing.
A lesson has repeatedly reiterated that the meaning'IT has taken on the supply business, in the sense that the products came from this era tend to be more customizable, so that they could produce cars all different (... in the face of Ford!) in this regard is an effective measure of Beppe Grillo indicating how things have changed: " up to fifty years ago, produced a well and tried to sell to as many people as possible, is now producing many goods and they are trying to sell to just one! .
But the architecture, then, how has this change in supply?
Already fifty years ago Gilles Ivain, had identified "the architectural complex will be modifiable. Its appearance will change in part or entirely, depending on the will of its inhabitants." If the architecture envisioned by Ivain is a kind of interface, ie a system through which can interact freely to organize the living space, then the hyper-space, beyond the pragmatism of inert matter, although the physical becomes metaphysical. The mutability of the architectural environment, will therefore always take new semantics, employees of the party, getting an architecture capable of being constantly 'Personal'.
0 comments:
Post a Comment